GeForce GT 630 OEM vs Quadro M5000M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000M with GeForce GT 630 OEM, including specs and performance data.

M5000M
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
17.95
+981%

M5000M outperforms GT 630 OEM by a whopping 981% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking287902
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.130.02
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM204GK107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price$468 $429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M5000M has 40550% better value for money than GT 630 OEM.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,536192
Core clock speed962 MHz875 MHz
Boost clock speed1051 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate93.6014.00
Floating-point performance2,995 gflops336.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M5000M and GeForce GT 630 OEM compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMIno data+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA5.23.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD78
+1014%
7−8
−1014%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 300−310
+971%
27−30
−971%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 350−400
+900%
35−40
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 300−310
+900%
30−33
−900%
Battlefield 5 600−650
+917%
55−60
−917%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 350−400
+872%
35−40
−872%
Cyberpunk 2077 300−310
+971%
27−30
−971%
Far Cry 5 450−500
+971%
40−45
−971%
Far Cry New Dawn 500−550
+942%
45−50
−942%
Forza Horizon 4 850−900
+924%
80−85
−924%
Hitman 3 350−400
+900%
35−40
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 750−800
+956%
70−75
−956%
Metro Exodus 600−650
+900%
60−65
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 500−550
+900%
50−55
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 600−650
+934%
55−60
−934%
Watch Dogs: Legion 600−650
+971%
55−60
−971%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 350−400
+900%
35−40
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 300−310
+900%
30−33
−900%
Battlefield 5 600−650
+917%
55−60
−917%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 350−400
+872%
35−40
−872%
Cyberpunk 2077 300−310
+971%
27−30
−971%
Far Cry 5 450−500
+971%
40−45
−971%
Far Cry New Dawn 500−550
+942%
45−50
−942%
Forza Horizon 4 850−900
+924%
80−85
−924%
Hitman 3 350−400
+900%
35−40
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 750−800
+956%
70−75
−956%
Metro Exodus 600−650
+900%
60−65
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 500−550
+900%
50−55
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 600−650
+934%
55−60
−934%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 700−750
+945%
67
−945%
Watch Dogs: Legion 600−650
+971%
55−60
−971%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 350−400
+900%
35−40
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 300−310
+900%
30−33
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 350−400
+872%
35−40
−872%
Cyberpunk 2077 300−310
+971%
27−30
−971%
Far Cry 5 450−500
+971%
40−45
−971%
Forza Horizon 4 850−900
+924%
80−85
−924%
Horizon Zero Dawn 750−800
+956%
70−75
−956%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 600−650
+934%
55−60
−934%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 400−450
+953%
38
−953%
Watch Dogs: Legion 600−650
+971%
55−60
−971%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 500−550
+900%
50−55
−900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 350−400
+900%
35−40
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 350−400
+900%
35−40
−900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 190−200
+956%
18−20
−956%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 170−180
+963%
16−18
−963%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 240−250
+943%
21−24
−943%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Far Cry 5 300−310
+900%
30−33
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+900%
35−40
−900%
Hitman 3 220−230
+948%
21−24
−948%
Horizon Zero Dawn 400−450
+981%
35−40
−981%
Metro Exodus 350−400
+961%
30−35
−961%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+900%
35−40
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 210−220
+950%
20−22
−950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 300−310
+900%
30−33
−900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+956%
18−20
−956%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+977%
12−14
−977%
Hitman 3 140−150
+977%
12−14
−977%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+950%
20−22
−950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 190−200
+956%
18−20
−956%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
+956%
9−10
−956%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+956%
9−10
−956%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+900%
10−11
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+942%
24−27
−942%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+950%
20−22
−950%
Metro Exodus 180−190
+959%
16−18
−959%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+971%
7−8
−971%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 170−180
+963%
16−18
−963%

This is how M5000M and GT 630 OEM compete in popular games:

  • M5000M is 1014% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.95 1.66
Recency 2 October 2015 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

The Quadro M5000M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce GT 630 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 129 votes

Rate Quadro M5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.