GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Quadro M5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M6-8Q GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-4A GRID M60-8Q Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Tesla M6 Tesla M60
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000 with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5000
2015
8 GB 256-bit, 150 Watt
23.60
+32.1%

M5000 outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking236308
Place by popularitynot in top-10051
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.26no data
Power efficiency11.2425.54
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM204TU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,856.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed861 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate132.999.84
Floating-point processing power4.252 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 211 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA5.27.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M5000 23.60
+32.1%
GTX 1650 Mobile 17.87

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M5000 9394
+32%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+27.1%
59
−27.1%
1440p45−50
+25%
36
−25%
4K30−35
+30.4%
23
−30.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p38.09no data
1440p63.49no data
4K95.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 83
+0%
83
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+0%
64
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+0%
59
+0%
Metro Exodus 40
+0%
40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 165
+0%
165
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 47
+0%
47
+0%
World of Tanks 130
+0%
130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Metro Exodus 39
+0%
39
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 47
+0%
47
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how Quadro M5000 and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M5000 is 27% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M5000 is 25% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M5000 is 30% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 23.60 17.87
Recency 29 June 2015 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro M5000 has a 32.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
vs
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
GTX 1650 GTX 1650
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
GTX 1660 GTX 1660
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
Pro 575X Pro 575X
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
P2000 Mobile P2000 Mobile
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
T2000 Mobile T2000 Mobile
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
Quadro T1000 T1000
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 Super
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 78 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3408 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.