Arc A750 vs Quadro M5000

Place in performance ranking	208	73
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.56	21.75
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code name	GM204	DG2-512
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	29 June 2015 (9 years ago)	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,856.99	$289
Current price	$823 (0.3x MSRP)	$625 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 154% better value for money than Quadro M5000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	3584
Core clock speed	861 MHz	2050 MHz
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	132.9	537.6
Floating-point performance	4,252 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2" (5.1 cm)	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	256 Bit	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 211 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync	no data
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M5000 24.37

Arc A750 43.83
+79.9%

Arc A750 outperforms Quadro M5000 by 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M5000 9412

Arc A750 11956
+27%

Arc A750 outperforms Quadro M5000 by 27% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	55−60 −85.5%	102 +85.5%
1440p	30−35 −103%	61 +103%
4K	18−21 −106%	37 +106%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −107%	62 +107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 −80%	90 +80%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −86.7%	140−150 +86.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −95.6%	85−90 +95.6%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −84%	90−95 +84%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −94.5%	100−110 +94.5%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −86.7%	112 +86.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −80%	90−95 +80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −95%	195 +95%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −80%	144 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −85.5%	100−110 +85.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 −90%	285 +90%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −92%	96 +92%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −83.3%	55 +83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −90%	76 +90%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −86.7%	140−150 +86.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −95.6%	85−90 +95.6%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −84%	90−95 +84%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −94.5%	100−110 +94.5%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −88.2%	160−170 +88.2%
Hitman 3	50−55 −80%	90−95 +80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −88.4%	170−180 +88.4%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −81.4%	127 +81.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −85.5%	100−110 +85.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 −83.8%	239 +83.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 −85%	185 +85%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −89.1%	100−110 +89.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −87.5%	45 +87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −97.1%	69 +97.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −95.6%	85−90 +95.6%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −84%	90−95 +84%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −80%	90 +80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −88.3%	113 +88.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −80.9%	199 +80.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −97.1%	69 +97.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −80%	63 +80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
−85.5%

100−110

+85.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −91.1%	85−90 +91.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −82.9%	128 +82.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −81%	38 +81%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −80%	54 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −94.3%	65−70 +94.3%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −90%	76 +90%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −97.5%	79 +97.5%
Hitman 3	30−33 −93.3%	55−60 +93.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −84%	92 +84%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −91.1%	86 +91.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −81.3%	145 +81.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −90%	57 +90%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −85.2%	50 +85.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−90%

75−80
+90%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −81%	35−40 +81%
Hitman 3	18−20 −100%	35−40 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −90%	55−60 +90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −83.3%	44 +83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −97.1%	69 +97.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −100%	28 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −87.5%	30 +87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −85.7%	24−27 +85.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −103%	61 +103%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −93.3%	58 +93.3%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −92.6%	52 +92.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −87.5%	30 +87.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−90.5%

40−45
+90.5%

This is how Quadro M5000 and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

Arc A750 is 85% faster in 1080p
Arc A750 is 103% faster in 1440p
Arc A750 is 106% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.37	43.83
Recency	29 June 2015	12 October 2022
Cost	$2856.99	$289
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt