RTX A5500 vs Quadro M4000M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000M with RTX A5500, including specs and performance data.

M4000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
16.08

RTX A5500 outperforms M4000M by a whopping 246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking31138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.642.67
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGM204GA102
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$832 $3965

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M4000M has 36% better value for money than RTX A5500.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,28010240
Core clock speed975 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1013 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate78.00532.8
Floating-point performance2,496 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000M and RTX A5500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s768.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.28.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M4000M 16.08
RTX A5500 55.66
+246%

RTX A5500 outperforms Quadro M4000M by 246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M4000M 6210
RTX A5500 21494
+246%

RTX A5500 outperforms Quadro M4000M by 246% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

M4000M 19306
RTX A5500 176915
+816%

RTX A5500 outperforms Quadro M4000M by 816% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
−227%
170−180
+227%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−240%
85−90
+240%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−227%
170−180
+227%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−240%
85−90
+240%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−242%
130−140
+242%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−241%
150−160
+241%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−233%
250−260
+233%
Hitman 3 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−244%
220−230
+244%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−233%
180−190
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−233%
170−180
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−233%
170−180
+233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−227%
170−180
+227%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−240%
85−90
+240%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−242%
130−140
+242%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−241%
150−160
+241%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−233%
250−260
+233%
Hitman 3 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−244%
220−230
+244%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−233%
180−190
+233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−233%
170−180
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−233%
170−180
+233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−240%
85−90
+240%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−242%
130−140
+242%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−233%
250−260
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−244%
220−230
+244%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−233%
170−180
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−224%
110−120
+224%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−233%
170−180
+233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−233%
100−105
+233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−223%
100−105
+223%
Hitman 3 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−233%
100−105
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−227%
85−90
+227%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Hitman 3 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−241%
75−80
+241%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%

This is how M4000M and RTX A5500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A5500 is 227% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.08 55.66
Recency 2 October 2015 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 230 Watt

The RTX A5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while RTX A5500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA RTX A5500
RTX A5500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 125 votes

Rate Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 42 votes

Rate RTX A5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.