Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Quadro M2200

Place in the ranking	424	86
Place by popularity	not in top-100	71
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	47.57
Power efficiency	13.99	13.30
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GM206	Navi 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	695 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	1036 MHz	1905 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	66.30	304.8
Floating-point processing power	2.122 TFLOPS	9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	64	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1377 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	88 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
VR Ready	no data	+
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	5.2	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.04

RX 5700 XT 42.93
+289%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M2200 4258

RX 5700 XT 16563
+289%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro M2200 7372

RX 5700 XT 35823
+386%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro M2200 24622

RX 5700 XT 83961
+241%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M2200 5850

RX 5700 XT 26189
+348%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro M2200 37796

RX 5700 XT 146093
+287%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro M2200 289176

RX 5700 XT 499658
+72.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Quadro M2200 47

RX 5700 XT 115
+145%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Quadro M2200 86

RX 5700 XT 110
+27.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Quadro M2200 58
+34.8%

RX 5700 XT 43

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Quadro M2200 72

RX 5700 XT 174
+142%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Quadro M2200 69

RX 5700 XT 81
+18.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Quadro M2200 25

RX 5700 XT 47
+90.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Quadro M2200 33

RX 5700 XT 141
+330%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Quadro M2200 5

RX 5700 XT 13
+144%

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Quadro M2200 33

RX 5700 XT 138
+320%

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Quadro M2200 72

RX 5700 XT 159
+121%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	44 −186%	126 +186%
1440p	18−20 −311%	74 +311%
4K	14 −229%	46 +229%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.17
1440p	no data	5.39
4K	no data	8.67

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−359%

78
+359%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −192%	76 +192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −547%	110 +547%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −469%	199 +469%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −436%	118 +436%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −359%	78 +359%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −381%	125 +381%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −281%	118 +281%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −308%	298 +308%
Hitman 3	21−24 −300%	84 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −431%	313 +431%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −300%	144 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −271%	115 +271%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −347%	160−170 +347%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −292%	259 +292%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −492%	154 +492%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −435%	91 +435%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −371%	165 +371%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −386%	107 +386%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −341%	75 +341%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −288%	101 +288%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −248%	108 +248%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −288%	283 +288%
Hitman 3	21−24 −310%	86 +310%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −398%	294 +398%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −300%	144 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −213%	97 +213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −436%	193 +436%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −207%	85−90 +207%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −276%	248 +276%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −138%	62 +138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −359%	78 +359%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −264%	80 +264%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −294%	67 +294%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −181%	73 +181%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −103%	148 +103%
Hitman 3	21−24 −295%	83 +295%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −129%	135 +129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −375%	171 +375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 −365%	93 +365%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −1.5%	67 +1.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−248%

108
+248%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −500%	126 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −394%	84 +394%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −382%	53 +382%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −743%	59 +743%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −427%	58 +427%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −700%	40 +700%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −354%	59 +354%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −435%	273 +435%
Hitman 3	14−16 −321%	59 +321%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −352%	104 +352%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −512%	104 +512%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −644%	119 +644%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −491%	65−70 +491%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −249%	241 +249%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−339%

79
+339%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −460%	56 +460%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −450%	44 +450%
Hitman 3	7−8 −543%	45 +543%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −142%	121 +142%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −622%	65 +622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −315%	54 +315%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −483%	35 +483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −560%	33 +560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −560%	33 +560%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −400%	30 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −464%	79 +464%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −788%	71 +788%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −225%	13 +225%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−300%

40
+300%

This is how Quadro M2200 and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is 186% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 XT is 311% faster in 1440p
RX 5700 XT is 229% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 5700 XT surpassed Quadro M2200 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.04	42.93
Recency	11 January 2017	7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	225 Watt

Quadro M2200 has 309.1% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 288.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.