Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs Quadro M2000M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 478 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2018) | Gen. 4 (2007−2010) |
| GPU code name | GM107 | Crestline |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 (8 years ago) | 9 May 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1197 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,870 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 13.5 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.405 gflops | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 40 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
| Display Port | 1.2 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| nView Display Management | + | no data |
| Optimus | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | 10 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
| CUDA | 5.0 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 October 2015 | 9 May 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 13 Watt |
M2000M has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, on the other hand, has 323.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro M2000M and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
