RTX A2000 Mobile vs Quadro M2000

Place in performance ranking	407	194
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.28	no data
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM206	GA107
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	8 April 2016 (8 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$437.75	no data
Current price	$285 (0.7x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	2560
Core clock speed	796 MHz	893 MHz
Boost clock speed	1163 MHz	1687 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	55.82	108.6
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2000 and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	201 mm	no data
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 106 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP DP DP DP	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	5.2	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 −160%	78 +160%
1440p	16−18 −156%	41 +156%
4K	16−18 −150%	40 +150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

−174%

74
+174%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −162%	55 +162%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −180%	80−85 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −189%	50−55 +189%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −158%	62 +158%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −181%	55−60 +181%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −148%	65−70 +148%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −175%	110−120 +175%
Hitman 3	18−20 −189%	50−55 +189%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −153%	100−110 +153%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −177%	80−85 +177%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −152%	65−70 +152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −170%	135 +170%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −158%	62 +158%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −179%	39 +179%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −180%	80−85 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −189%	50−55 +189%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −178%	50 +178%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −181%	55−60 +181%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −148%	65−70 +148%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −175%	110−120 +175%
Hitman 3	12−14 −167%	32 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −153%	100−110 +153%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −157%	36 +157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −152%	65−70 +152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −170%	108 +170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −174%	96 +174%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −167%	70−75 +167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −167%	32 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −189%	50−55 +189%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −156%	41 +156%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −181%	55−60 +181%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −175%	110−120 +175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −153%	100−110 +153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −169%	94 +169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −178%	50 +178%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −190%	29 +190%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−152%

65−70
+152%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −170%	27 +170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −150%	25 +150%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −152%	53 +152%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −183%	50−55 +183%
Hitman 3	12−14 −158%	30−35 +158%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −152%	50−55 +152%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −172%	49 +172%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −163%	63 +163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −167%	30−35 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −150%	20 +150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−169%

40−45
+169%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −150%	24−27 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Hitman 3	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −183%	17 +183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −175%	33 +175%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −150%	24−27 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−175%

21−24

+175%

This is how Quadro M2000 and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A2000 Mobile is 160% faster in 1080p
RTX A2000 Mobile is 156% faster in 1440p
RTX A2000 Mobile is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.31	25.56
Recency	8 April 2016	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	95 Watt