NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs K620M
Comparison of Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
22.59 GTexel / s
17.98 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
44.8 GB / s
14.4 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
K1100M 2.19 +19%
Quadro K620M 1.84
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
K1100M 9228 +1.5%
Quadro K620M 9092
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Quadro K620M 1424 +9.6%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Quadro K620M 1621 +20.9%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Quadro K620M 2434 +33.2%
3DMark Vantage Performance
K1100M 8992 +14.1%
Quadro K620M 7880
Unigine Heaven 3.0
Quadro K620M 22 +22.2%
K1100M 1044 +12.9%
Quadro K620M 925
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s −411.1%
92 Mh/s +411.1%
Let's see how good Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
19% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (44.8 vs 14.4 GB/s)
OpenCL 1.2 (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K620M
Much newer (1 March 2015 vs 23 July 2013)
Less power hungry (30 vs 45 watts)
OpenCL (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
3D Vision Surround
So, Quadro K1100M or K620M?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro K1100M.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro K1100M and Quadro K620M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.