Quadro K510M vs K620

Place in performance ranking	563	901
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.28	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GM107	GK208
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)	23 July 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$189.89	no data
Current price	$286 (1.5x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	192
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	846 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	41 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.98	13.54
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	324.9 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K620 and Quadro K510M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	160 mm	no data
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 29 GB/s	19.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DVI-I DP	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	+	+
Mosaic	+	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
nView Desktop Management	+	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12
Shader Model	5	5
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	5.0	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K620 5.77
+248%

Quadro K510M 1.66

K620 outperforms K510M by 248% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K620 2230
+248%

Quadro K510M 641

K620 outperforms K510M by 248% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

+200%

4−5
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Hitman 3	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +233%	14−16 −233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +233%	9−10 −233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +233%	12−14 −233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Hitman 3	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +233%	14−16 −233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +233%	9−10 −233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +233%	12−14 −233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +233%	14−16 −233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +233%	9−10 −233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +233%	12−14 −233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+233%

3−4
−233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Hitman 3	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

+200%

4−5
−200%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%