NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs Tesla K20m

NVIDIA Quadro K5200
NVIDIA Tesla K20m

General info

Comparison of Quadro K5200 and Tesla K20m architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
not rated
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Code name
Release date
22 July 2014
5 January 2013
Launch price (MSRP)
Price now
no data

Technical specs

Quadro K5200 and Tesla K20m's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K5200 and Tesla K20m's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
667 MHz
706 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
no data
Transistor count
7,080 million
7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
225 Watt
Texture fill rate
148.0 GTexel / s
146.8 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance
3,553 gflops
3,524 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro K5200 and Tesla K20m compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
267 mm
267 mm
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin


Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K5200 and Tesla K20m: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
5 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
320 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.3 GB / s
208.0 GB / s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K5200 and Tesla K20m.
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs

API support

APIs supported by Quadro K5200 and Tesla K20m, sometimes including their particular versions.
12.0 (11_1)
12.0 (11_0)

Rendering quality tests

GFXBench render quality
4541 +0%
4541 +0%
GFXBench high precision render quality
4541 +0%
4541 +0%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K5200 and Tesla K20m. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
226 Mh/s
no data

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Much newer (22 July 2014 vs 5 January 2013)
Cheaper ($1699.74 vs $3199)
Less power hungry (150 vs 225 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Wider memory bus (320 vs 256 bit)
More pipelines (2496 vs 2304)
Higher memory bandwidth (208 vs 192.3 GB/s)

So, Quadro K5200 or Tesla K20m?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro K5200 and Tesla K20m, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro K5200
NVIDIA Tesla K20m

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro K5200 or Tesla K20m, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.