Radeon RX 7400 vs GRID K260Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K260Q with Radeon RX 7400, including specs and performance data.

GRID K260Q
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
6.67

7400 outperforms K260Q by a whopping 311% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking584223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.38no data
Power efficiency2.4051.55
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGK104Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (12 years ago)8 August 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$937 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361792
Core clock speed745 MHz1452 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2300 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36257.6
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS16.49 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache128 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GRID K260Q 6.67
RX 7400 27.40
+311%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K260Q 2949
Samples: 4
RX 7400 12113
+311%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.67 27.40
Recency 28 June 2013 8 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 43 Watt

RX 7400 has a 310.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 423.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K260Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K260Q is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GRID K260Q
AMD Radeon RX 7400
Radeon RX 7400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K260Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K260Q or Radeon RX 7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.