Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Quadro K4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4200 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
11.19

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms Quadro K4200 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking389292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.65no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe LPG
GPU code nameGK104Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 no data
Current price$311 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13447
Core clock speed771 MHzno data
Boost clock speed784 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Wattno data
Texture fill rate87.81no data
Floating-point performance2,107 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K4200 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
CUDA3.0no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−61.9%
34
+61.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−62.9%
55−60
+62.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−58.3%
38
+58.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−62%
80−85
+62%
Hitman 3 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−72.5%
65−70
+72.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−60%
45−50
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−60%
55−60
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−80%
50−55
+80%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−62.9%
55−60
+62.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−61.9%
34
+61.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−62%
80−85
+62%
Hitman 3 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−72.5%
65−70
+72.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−65.7%
55−60
+65.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−60%
45−50
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−60%
55−60
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−73.3%
52
+73.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−80%
50−55
+80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−62.9%
55−60
+62.9%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−66.7%
35
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−62%
80−85
+62%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−57.1%
22
+57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−80%
50−55
+80%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Hitman 3 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−77.8%
30−35
+77.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Hitman 3 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

This is how Quadro K4200 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 62% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.19 17.43
Recency 22 July 2014 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 141 vote

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.