GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Quadro K420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro K420
2014
1 GB/2 GB 128-bit, 41 Watt
1.93

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Quadro K420 by a whopping 2727% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking86439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGK107GN21-X11
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (9 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$96.67 no data
Current price$402 (4.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1929728
Core clock speed876 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2040 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate14.02515.3
Floating-point performance336.4 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K420 and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB/2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1782 MHz20000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 29 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-I DPPortable Device Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model56.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA3.08.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−2817%
175
+2817%
1440p4−5
−3175%
131
+3175%
4K3−4
−2733%
85
+2733%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 54.56
Recency 22 July 2014 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB/2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 150 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K420 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K420 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K420
Quadro K420
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 138 votes

Rate Quadro K420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 497 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.