Mobility Radeon vs Quadro K4100M

Place in performance ranking	515	981
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.77	0.02
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code name	N15E-Q3-A2	M6
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 July 2013 (10 years ago)	1 December 2001 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,499	no data
Current price	$323 (0.2x MSRP)	$202

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

K4100M has 8750% better value for money than ATI Mobility.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	no data
Core clock speed	706 MHz	144 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	67.78	0.43
Floating-point performance	1,627 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K4100M and Mobility Radeon compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	AGP 4x
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	288 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB/s	2.304 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	7.0
Shader Model	5	no data
OpenGL	4.5	1.3
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K4100M 7.13
+432%

ATI Mobility 1.34

Quadro K4100M outperforms Mobility Radeon by 432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

K4100M 3654
+430%

ATI Mobility 690

Quadro K4100M outperforms Mobility Radeon by 430% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50 +456%	9−10 −456%
4K	13 +550%	2−3 −550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
+400%

10−12

−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +424%	21−24 −424%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +431%	16−18 −431%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +400%	20−22 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +414%	35−40 −414%
Hitman 3	65−70 +400%	12−14 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +431%	30−35 −431%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +426%	18−20 −426%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +400%	20−22 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +422%	21−24 −422%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +400%	27−30 −400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +424%	21−24 −424%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +431%	16−18 −431%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +400%	20−22 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +414%	35−40 −414%
Hitman 3	65−70 +400%	12−14 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +431%	30−35 −431%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +426%	18−20 −426%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +400%	20−22 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +422%	21−24 −422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +400%	27−30 −400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +431%	16−18 −431%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +414%	35−40 −414%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +431%	30−35 −431%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +422%	21−24 −422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +400%	27−30 −400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

100−105

+400%

20−22
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +400%	12−14 −400%
Hitman 3	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+400%

12−14

−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Hitman 3	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%