Radeon Pro W6800 vs Quadro K2200

Place in performance ranking	445	48
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.10	20.45
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM107	Navi 21
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75	$2,249
Current price	$313 (0.8x MSRP)	$1990 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W6800 has 560% better value for money than Quadro K2200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	3840
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	2075 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	2320 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	44.96	556.8
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	202 mm	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

6x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K2200 9.19

Pro W6800 51.32
+458%

Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms Quadro K2200 by 458% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K2200 3549

Pro W6800 19821
+458%

Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms Quadro K2200 by 458% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −500%	144 +500%
1440p	21−24 −495%	125 +495%
4K	14−16 −514%	86 +514%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−494%

95−100
+494%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −514%	85−90 +514%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −529%	85−90 +529%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −504%	160−170 +504%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −472%	100−110 +472%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −490%	120−130 +490%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −490%	170−180 +490%
Hitman 3	18−20 −472%	100−110 +472%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −466%	283 +466%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −514%	120−130 +514%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −517%	110−120 +517%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −464%	282 +464%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −533%	110−120 +533%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −514%	85−90 +514%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −529%	85−90 +529%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −504%	160−170 +504%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −472%	100−110 +472%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −490%	120−130 +490%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −490%	170−180 +490%
Hitman 3	18−20 −472%	100−110 +472%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −509%	210−220 +509%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −500%	30 +500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −517%	110−120 +517%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −516%	277 +516%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −469%	199 +469%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −533%	110−120 +533%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −514%	85−90 +514%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −529%	85−90 +529%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −494%	95−100 +494%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −472%	100−110 +472%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −490%	170−180 +490%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −463%	225 +463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −496%	268 +496%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −481%	157 +481%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −533%	110−120 +533%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
−517%

110−120

+517%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −483%	100−110 +483%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −471%	120−130 +471%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −470%	55−60 +470%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −479%	80−85 +479%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −488%	45−50 +488%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −540%	64 +540%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −528%	110−120 +528%
Hitman 3	12−14 −492%	70−75 +492%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −497%	179 +497%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −511%	55 +511%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −506%	212 +506%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −493%	80−85 +493%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −467%	50−55 +467%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−529%

85−90
+529%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −475%	45−50 +475%
Hitman 3	7−8 −514%	40−45 +514%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −483%	70−75 +483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −529%	40−45 +529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −519%	99 +519%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −540%	30−35 +540%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −506%	109 +506%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −511%	55 +511%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−500%

45−50

+500%

This is how Quadro K2200 and Pro W6800 compete in popular games:

Pro W6800 is 500% faster in 1080p
Pro W6800 is 495% faster in 1440p
Pro W6800 is 514% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.19	51.32
Recency	22 July 2014	8 June 2021
Cost	$395.75	$2249
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	250 Watt