Radeon HD 8400E vs Quadro K2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro K2200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 68 Watt
9.19
+1194%

Quadro K2200 outperforms Radeon HD 8400E by a whopping 1194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking4451130
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.08no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGM107Kalindi
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (9 years ago)23 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.75 no data
Current price$313 (0.8x MSRP)$293

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K2200 and HD 8400E have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640128
Core clock speed1046 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate44.964.800
Floating-point performance1,439 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5012 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K2200 9.19
+1194%
HD 8400E 0.71

Quadro K2200 outperforms Radeon HD 8400E by 1194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K2200 3550
+1191%
HD 8400E 275

Quadro K2200 outperforms Radeon HD 8400E by 1191% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.19 0.71
Recency 22 July 2014 23 April 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 25 Watt

The Quadro K2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8400E in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8400E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200
AMD Radeon HD 8400E
Radeon HD 8400E

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 384 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.