GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs Quadro K2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2200 with GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K2200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 68 Watt
9.21
+490%

K2200 outperforms GTX 660M Mac Edition by a whopping 490% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking470970
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.09no data
Power efficiency9.942.29
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM107GK107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed1046 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate44.9630.40
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA5.03.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.21 1.56
Recency 22 July 2014 1 April 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro K2200 has a 490.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 660M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 36% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 403 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.