T1000 vs Quadro K2100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

K2100M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
3.51

T1000 outperforms Quadro K2100M by a whopping 466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking687262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.5939.20
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGK106TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (10 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$84.95 no data
Current price$208 (2.4x MSRP)$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T1000 has 6544% better value for money than K2100M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576896
Core clock speed667 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1395 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate32.0278.12
Floating-point performance768.4 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K2100M and T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth48.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model56.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2100M 3.51
T1000 19.86
+466%

T1000 outperforms Quadro K2100M by 466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K2100M 1355
T1000 7676
+466%

T1000 outperforms Quadro K2100M by 466% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

K2100M 4499
T1000 37339
+730%

T1000 outperforms Quadro K2100M by 730% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

K2100M 4106
T1000 34731
+746%

T1000 outperforms Quadro K2100M by 746% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

K2100M 3028
T1000 37817
+1149%

T1000 outperforms Quadro K2100M by 1149% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
−442%
130−140
+442%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−456%
50−55
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Hitman 3 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

This is how K2100M and T1000 compete in popular games:

  • T1000 is 442% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.51 19.86
Recency 23 July 2013 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 50 Watt

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation card while T1000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Quadro K2100M
NVIDIA T1000
T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 264 votes

Rate Quadro K2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 52 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.