Quadro T1000 vs K2100M

Place in performance ranking	686	297
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.58	8.57
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GK106	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013 (10 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$84.95	no data
Current price	$208 (2.4x MSRP)	$920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro T1000 has 1378% better value for money than K2100M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	576	no data
Core clock speed	667 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	2,540 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.02	no data
Floating-point performance	768.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K2100M and Quadro T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5	no data
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	+	no data
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2100M 3.51

Quadro T1000 17.00
+384%

T1000 outperforms K2100M by 384% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K2100M 1357

Quadro T1000 6580
+385%

T1000 outperforms K2100M by 385% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

K2100M 4463

Quadro T1000 33844
+658%

T1000 outperforms K2100M by 658% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

K2100M 4082

Quadro T1000 30247
+641%

T1000 outperforms K2100M by 641% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

K2100M 3028

Quadro T1000 34236
+1031%

T1000 outperforms K2100M by 1031% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−358%

110−120
+358%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
−350%

27−30

+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −362%	60−65 +362%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Hitman 3	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −362%	60−65 +362%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Hitman 3	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9 −344%	40−45 +344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Hitman 3	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Hitman 3	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1