Radeon R7 250E vs Quadro K1200

Place in the ranking	521	665
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.50	1.13
Power efficiency	11.73	5.49
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	GM107	Cape Verde
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 January 2015 (9 years ago)	20 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$321.97	$109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K1200 has 121% better value for money than R7 250E.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	512
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	35.97	25.60
Floating-point processing power	1.151 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	160 mm	168 mm
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 80 GB/s	72 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	5.0	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.62	4.36
Recency	28 January 2015	20 December 2013
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	55 Watt

Quadro K1200 has a 74.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 250E in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 250E is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.