GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs Quadro K1000M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

K1000M
2.02

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms Quadro K1000M by 1735% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking838119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.15no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN14P-Q1GN20-E5 GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2012 (11 years old)4 January 2021 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.90 no data
Current price$232 (1.9x MSRP)no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925120
Core clock speed850 MHz780 - 1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1290 - 1620 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60287.0
Floating-point performance326.4 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro K1000M and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA+8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K1000M 2.02
RTX 3070 Mobile 37.06
+1735%

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms Quadro K1000M by 1735% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K1000M 783
RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+1734%

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms Quadro K1000M by 1734% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

K1000M 5165
RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
+1394%

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms Quadro K1000M by 1394% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

K1000M 1102
RTX 3070 Mobile 33996
+2985%

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms Quadro K1000M by 2985% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p9
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Full HD18
−550%
117
+550%
1440p4−5
−1825%
77
+1825%
4K2−3
−2350%
49
+2350%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2280%
119
+2280%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−3533%
100−110
+3533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−818%
100−110
+818%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2040%
107
+2040%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11800%
119
+11800%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−11100%
112
+11100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4625%
189
+4625%
Hitman 3 3−4
−4833%
148
+4833%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−3000%
93
+3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−2060%
108
+2060%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1650%
140
+1650%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−4367%
134
+4367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−818%
100−110
+818%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1660%
88
+1660%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11300%
114
+11300%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−10700%
108
+10700%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4600%
188
+4600%
Hitman 3 3−4
−4500%
138
+4500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2700%
84
+2700%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3133%
97
+3133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1220%
66
+1220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1413%
121
+1413%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3300%
170
+3300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−4100%
126
+4100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1380%
74
+1380%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10600%
107
+10600%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−9500%
96
+9500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4075%
167
+4075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1780%
94
+1780%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1425%
60−65
+1425%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1860%
98
+1860%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−600%
63
+600%
Metro Exodus 0−1 59
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−3700%
38
+3700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−1680%
89
+1680%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2933%
91
+2933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2500%
50−55
+2500%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%
Hitman 3 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−113%
17
+113%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1600%
51
+1600%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%

This is how K1000M and RTX 3070 Mobile compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 1678% faster than K1000M

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 550% faster than K1000M

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 1825% faster than K1000M

4K resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 2350% faster than K1000M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 11800% faster than the K1000M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3070 Mobile surpassed K1000M in all 48 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.02 37.06
Recency 1 June 2012 4 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Quadro K1000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 68 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro K1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1578 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.