GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Quadro GP100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GP100 with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GP100
2016
16 GB HBM2, 235 Watt
42.40
+127%

Quadro GP100 outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking79279
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.38no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGP100GN20-S7
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (7 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$1482 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842048
Core clock speed1304 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1442 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt30-45 Watt
Texture fill rate323.0189.1
Floating-point performance10,329 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro GP100 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1430 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.08.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+126%
42
−126%
1440p65−70
+124%
29
−124%
4K65−70
+117%
30
−117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+124%
49
−124%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+116%
35−40
−116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
+126%
42
−126%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+113%
60−65
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+124%
35−40
−124%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+126%
42
−126%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+116%
40−45
−116%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+121%
85−90
−121%
Hitman 3 95−100
+116%
44
−116%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+116%
70−75
−116%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+126%
60−65
−126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+116%
50−55
−116%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+127%
75
−127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
+117%
46
−117%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+116%
35−40
−116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+114%
21
−114%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+113%
60−65
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+124%
35−40
−124%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+117%
30
−117%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+116%
40−45
−116%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+120%
50−55
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+121%
85−90
−121%
Hitman 3 45−50
+114%
21
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+116%
70−75
−116%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+126%
60−65
−126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+116%
50−55
−116%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+126%
62
−126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+124%
58
−124%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+111%
55−60
−111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+116%
35−40
−116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+100%
7
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+124%
35−40
−124%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+120%
25
−120%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+116%
40−45
−116%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+121%
85−90
−121%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+116%
70−75
−116%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+118%
55
−118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+112%
33
−112%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+122%
18
−122%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+116%
50−55
−116%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+122%
35−40
−122%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+116%
35−40
−116%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+111%
18−20
−111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+108%
24−27
−108%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+116%
37
−116%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+122%
35−40
−122%
Hitman 3 45−50
+105%
21−24
−105%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+124%
35−40
−124%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+121%
30−35
−121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+113%
47
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+126%
30−35
−126%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Hitman 3 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+111%
18−20
−111%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+112%
24−27
−112%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%

This is how Quadro GP100 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GP100 is 126% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GP100 is 124% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro GP100 is 117% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.40 18.66
Recency 1 October 2016 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 30 Watt

The Quadro GP100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GP100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1651 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.