NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Quadro FX Go1400 provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 0.23% of a leader's which is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell.
Contents
Summary
NVIDIA started Quadro FX Go1400 sales 25 February 2005. This is a Curie architecture notebook card based on 130 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 256 MB of DDR memory clocked at 0.3 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 18.88 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via MXM-III interface.
Primary details
Some basic facts about Quadro FX Go1400: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in the ranking | 1412 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | |
| GPU code name | NV41 | |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | |
| Release date | 25 February 2005 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Quadro FX Go1400's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro FX Go1400's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Core clock speed | 275 MHz | of 980 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) |
| Number of transistors | 222 million | of 100,000 million (Data Center GPU Max 1100) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | of 0.003 MB (Arc Graphics 140V) |
| Texture fill rate | 2.200 | of 1,968.0 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server) |
| ROPs | 8 | of 512 (Moore Threads MTT S4000) |
| TMUs | 8 | of 896 (Data Center GPU Max 1350) |
Form factor & compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro FX Go1400 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
| Interface | MXM-III |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro FX Go1400: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | DDR | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | of 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X) |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 384 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) |
| Memory clock speed | 295 MHz | of 16384000 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) |
| Memory bandwidth | 18.88 GB/s | of 983040 MB (GeForce RTX 5080) |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro FX Go1400. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | No outputs |
API and SDK support
APIs supported by Quadro FX Go1400, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | of 4.6 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) |
| OpenCL | N/A | |
| Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro FX Go1400. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Send your test results of Quadro FX Go1400.
AMD equivalent
According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro FX Go1400 is Mobility FireGL V5700, which is faster by 43% and higher by 75 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro FX Go1400:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
