Quadro T500 Mobile vs Quadro FX Go1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FX 350M FX 550M FX 1500M FX 2500M FX 3500M FX Go540 FX Go1400 NVS 110M NVS 120M NVS 300M NVS 510M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX Go1400 and Quadro T500 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FX Go1400
2005
256 MB DDR
0.24

T500 Mobile outperforms Go1400 by a whopping 3321% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX Go1400 FX Go1400
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1422548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data35.18
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV41TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date25 February 2005 (20 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speed275 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors222 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate2.20094.92
Floating-point processing powerno data3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs856
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed295 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth18.88 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
1440p-0−115
4K-0−117

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how FX Go1400 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 3500% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 50 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.24 8.21
Recency 25 February 2005 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm

T500 Mobile has a 3320.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX Go1400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
Quadro FX Go1400
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX Go1400 Quadro FX Go1400
vs
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 Mobility FireGL V5700
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
FX Go1400 Quadro FX Go1400
vs
FX Go 1400 Quadro FX Go 1400
NVS 5100M NVS 5100M
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GP104 1060 6 GB GP104
NVS 5100M NVS 5100M
vs
9500 GT Rev. 2 9500 GT Rev. 2
NVS 510M NVIDIA NVS 510M
vs
A100 PCIe PCIe
NVS 510M NVIDIA NVS 510M
vs
RTX 4060 Ti AD104 4060 Ti AD104
FX 550M NVIDIA FX 550M
vs
7050 + nForce 620i 7050 + nForce 620i
FX Go1400 NVIDIA FX Go1400
vs
T600 Max-Q Max-Q
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
R9 290X2 290X2
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
GT 705 OEM 705 OEM
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
GT 620 620
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
7800 GT 7800 GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX Go1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 113 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX Go1400 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.