ATI Mobility Radeon X300 vs Quadro FX Go1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1445not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameNV41M22
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date25 February 2005 (21 years ago)1 November 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6
Core clock speed275 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data350 MHz
Number of transistors222 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm110 nm
Texture fill rate2.2001.400
ROPs84
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed295 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth18.88 GB/s4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0b
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2005 1 November 2005
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 110 nm

FX Go1400 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI Mobility X300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX Go1400 and Mobility Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX Go1400 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon X300 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX Go1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX Go1400 or Mobility Radeon X300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.