Radeon RX 5500M vs Quadro FX 770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 770M with Radeon RX 5500M, including specs and performance data.

FX 770M
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.57

RX 5500M outperforms FX 770M by a whopping 2430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1204357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1311.75
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG96Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date14 August 2008 (16 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$527 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321408
Core clock speed500 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1645 MHz
Number of transistors314 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000144.8
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1688

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 770M 0.57
RX 5500M 14.42
+2430%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 770M 220
RX 5500M 5563
+2429%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−2750%
57
+2750%
1440p2−3
−2700%
56
+2700%
4K1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p263.50no data
1440p263.50no data
4K527.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55
+1733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−975%
43
+975%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1667%
53
+1667%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1333%
43
+1333%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1227%
146
+1227%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−463%
169
+463%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−725%
30−35
+725%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1500%
48
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1000%
33
+1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1209%
144
+1209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1267%
82
+1267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−460%
168
+460%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−675%
31
+675%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−767%
26
+767%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30
+900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−900%
50
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−527%
69
+527%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1100%
72
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−350%
45
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+36.4%
22
−36.4%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Hitman 3 6−7
−450%
33
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1733%
55
+1733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−16200%
163
+16200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1233%
40
+1233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−900%
20
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 57
+0%
57
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+0%
26
+0%
Battlefield 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 36
+0%
36
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 54
+0%
54
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 54
+0%
54
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10
+0%
10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 9
+0%
9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+0%
65
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how FX 770M and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500M is 2750% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500M is 2700% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500M is 3000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FX 770M is 36% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5500M is 16200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • FX 770M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 5500M is ahead in 34 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 14.42
Recency 14 August 2008 7 October 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 85 Watt

FX 770M has 142.9% lower power consumption.

RX 5500M, on the other hand, has a 2429.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5500M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX 770M
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 31 vote

Rate Quadro FX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 351 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.