Arc Pro A30M vs Quadro FX 770M

Place in the ranking	1204	345
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.13	21.04
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	G96	DG2-128
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	14 August 2008 (16 years ago)	8 August 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$527	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	1024
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.000	128.0
Floating-point processing power	0.08 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 770M 0.57

Arc Pro A30M 15.19
+2565%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 770M 220

Arc Pro A30M 5862
+2565%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−2400%

75−80
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2500%	130−140 +2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2536%	290−300 +2536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −2400%	150−160 +2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −2400%	750−800 +2400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2500%	130−140 +2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2536%	290−300 +2536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −2400%	150−160 +2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −2500%	260−270 +2500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −2400%	750−800 +2400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −2400%	100−105 +2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2500%	130−140 +2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2536%	290−300 +2536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −2400%	150−160 +2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −2500%	260−270 +2500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −2400%	750−800 +2400%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−2300%

24−27
+2300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2400%	150−160 +2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −2400%	75−80 +2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−2400%

75−80
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2400%

50−55
+2400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.57	15.19
Recency	14 August 2008	8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	50 Watt

FX 770M has 42.9% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has a 2564.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro A30M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 770M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.