NVS 5100M vs Quadro FX 570
- Interface PCIe 1.0 x16
- Core clock speed 460 MHz
- Max video memory 256 MB
- Memory type DDR2
- Memory clock speed 800 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface MXM-A (3.0)
- Core clock speed 550 MHz
- Max video memory 1024 MB
- Memory type GDDR3
- Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
- Maximum resolution
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1111 | not rated |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | G84 | GT216 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 September 2007 (15 years old) | 7 January 2010 (13 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | no data |
| Current price | $81 (0.4x MSRP) | $25 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 460 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 289 million | 486 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.680 | 8.800 |
| Floating-point performance | 29.44 gflops | 116.16 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Length | 198 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | MXM Module |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
Quadro FX 570 outperforms NVS 5100M by 21% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 12 September 2007 | 7 January 2010 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 48 |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 | 25.6 |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 35 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 570 and NVS 5100M. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
