GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs Quadro FX 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX 4600
2007
768 MB GDDR3, 134 Watt
1.11
+30.6%

Quadro FX 4600 outperforms GeForce 9600 GSO 512 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking10451095
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.040.09
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG80G94
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 March 2007 (17 years ago)23 October 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data
Current price$179 (0.1x MSRP)$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

9600 GSO 512 has 125% better value for money than FX 4600.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9648
CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed500 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors681 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt90 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate24.0015.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance230.4 gflops156 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm9" (22.9 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin6-pin
SLI optionsno data2-way

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount768 MB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoTwo Dual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 4600 1.11
+30.6%
9600 GSO 512 0.85

Quadro FX 4600 outperforms GeForce 9600 GSO 512 by 31% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 4600 430
+30.7%
9600 GSO 512 329

Quadro FX 4600 outperforms GeForce 9600 GSO 512 by 31% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.11 0.85
Recency 5 March 2007 23 October 2008
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 90 Watt

The Quadro FX 4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GSO 512 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 60 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.