Tesla C870 vs GeForce 9600 GSO 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1203not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.67no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG94G80
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 October 2008 (17 years ago)2 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48128
Core clock speed650 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors505 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt171 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.6038.40
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs2432
L2 Cache64 KB96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTVNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2008 2 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 171 Watt

9600 GSO 512 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 90% lower power consumption.

Tesla C870, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and Tesla C870. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla C870 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
NVIDIA Tesla C870
Tesla C870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 64 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GSO 512 or Tesla C870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.