TITAN RTX vs Quadro FX 4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 4500 with TITAN RTX, including specs and performance data.

FX 4500
2005
512 MB GDDR3, 109 Watt
0.59

TITAN RTX outperforms FX 4500 by a whopping 8178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking116856
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.33
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameG70TU102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 July 2005 (18 years ago)18 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $2,499
Current price$115 (0x MSRP)$1035 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 4500 and TITAN RTX have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed430 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors302 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)109 Watt280 Watt
Texture fill rate10.32509.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth33.6 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 4500 0.59
TITAN RTX 48.84
+8178%

TITAN RTX outperforms Quadro FX 4500 by 8178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 4500 227
TITAN RTX 18858
+8207%

TITAN RTX outperforms Quadro FX 4500 by 8207% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−15700%
158
+15700%
1440p1−2
−10300%
104
+10300%
4K0−176

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
−8128%
6500−6550
+8128%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
−8169%
8600−8650
+8169%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 104
−8169%
8600−8650
+8169%
Battlefield 5 209
−8178%
17300−17350
+8178%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 143
−8152%
11800−11850
+8152%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−8128%
6500−6550
+8128%
Far Cry 5 127
−8168%
10500−10550
+8168%
Far Cry New Dawn 201
−8159%
16600−16650
+8159%
Forza Horizon 4 187
−8162%
15450−15500
+8162%
Hitman 3 117
−8148%
9650−9700
+8148%
Horizon Zero Dawn 332
−8168%
27450−27500
+8168%
Metro Exodus 144
−8164%
11900−11950
+8164%
Red Dead Redemption 2 127
−8168%
10500−10550
+8168%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 351
−8176%
29050−29100
+8176%
Watch Dogs: Legion 112
−8159%
9250−9300
+8159%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95
−8163%
7850−7900
+8163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
−8139%
7250−7300
+8139%
Battlefield 5 203
−8176%
16800−16850
+8176%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 131
−8144%
10800−10850
+8144%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−8128%
6500−6550
+8128%
Far Cry 5 101
−8167%
8350−8400
+8167%
Far Cry New Dawn 154
−8147%
12700−12750
+8147%
Forza Horizon 4 254
−8168%
21000−21050
+8168%
Hitman 3 94
−8145%
7750−7800
+8145%
Horizon Zero Dawn 336
−8174%
27800−27850
+8174%
Metro Exodus 137
−8148%
11300−11350
+8148%
Red Dead Redemption 2 126
−8154%
10400−10450
+8154%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 286
−8169%
23650−23700
+8169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267
−8177%
22100−22150
+8177%
Watch Dogs: Legion 204
−8160%
16850−16900
+8160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
−8128%
6500−6550
+8128%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
−8150%
6600−6650
+8150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 102
−8135%
8400−8450
+8135%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
−8169%
6450−6500
+8169%
Far Cry 5 79
−8128%
6500−6550
+8128%
Forza Horizon 4 175
−8157%
14450−14500
+8157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 218
−8157%
18000−18050
+8157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 242
−8164%
20000−20050
+8164%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
−8173%
11500−11550
+8173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 86
−8156%
7100−7150
+8156%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 123
−8152%
10150−10200
+8152%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
−8165%
8100−8150
+8165%
Far Cry New Dawn 144
−8164%
11900−11950
+8164%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−8141%
4450−4500
+8141%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
−8158%
5450−5500
+8158%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 122
−8138%
10050−10100
+8138%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
−8158%
5450−5500
+8158%
Far Cry 5 134
−8146%
11050−11100
+8146%
Forza Horizon 4 157
−8148%
12950−13000
+8148%
Hitman 3 100
−8150%
8250−8300
+8150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 168
−8174%
13900−13950
+8174%
Metro Exodus 114
−8146%
9400−9450
+8146%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183
−8151%
15100−15150
+8151%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−8147%
6350−6400
+8147%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70
−8114%
5750−5800
+8114%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 119
−8177%
9850−9900
+8177%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 88
−8139%
7250−7300
+8139%
Far Cry New Dawn 67
−8109%
5500−5550
+8109%
Hitman 3 48
−8129%
3950−4000
+8129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−8158%
5450−5500
+8158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
−8158%
5450−5500
+8158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
−8152%
8500−8550
+8152%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
−8169%
4300−4350
+8169%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
−8156%
3550−3600
+8156%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
−8100%
4100−4150
+8100%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
−8082%
2700−2750
+8082%
Far Cry 5 49
−8165%
4050−4100
+8165%
Forza Horizon 4 114
−8146%
9400−9450
+8146%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
−8135%
8400−8450
+8135%
Metro Exodus 82
−8132%
6750−6800
+8132%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
−8156%
3550−3600
+8156%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 74
−8143%
6100−6150
+8143%

This is how FX 4500 and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 15700% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 10300% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 48.84
Recency 28 July 2005 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 109 Watt 280 Watt

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4500 is a workstation graphics card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
Quadro FX 4500
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 801 vote

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.