Radeon RX Vega 3 vs Quadro FX 4500 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX 4500 X2
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 145 Watt
0.61

Radeon RX Vega 3 outperforms Quadro FX 4500 X2 by a whopping 387% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1161741
Place by popularitynot in top-10076
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.93
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameG71Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 April 2006 (18 years ago)7 January 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,799 no data
Current price$300 (0.1x MSRP)$371

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 4500 X2 and RX Vega 3 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed500 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors278 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0012.13

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 4500 X2 and Radeon RX Vega 3 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1210 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.72 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 4500 X2 0.61
RX Vega 3 2.97
+387%

Radeon RX Vega 3 outperforms Quadro FX 4500 X2 by 387% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 4500 X2 236
RX Vega 3 1149
+387%

Radeon RX Vega 3 outperforms Quadro FX 4500 X2 by 387% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−500%
12
+500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 2.97
Recency 24 April 2006 7 January 2018
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 15 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4500 X2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4500 X2 is a workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2
Quadro FX 4500 X2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4500 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1834 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.