Radeon RX 6600M vs Quadro FX 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.22
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG72Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 March 2006 (18 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71792
Core clock speed450 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors112 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800270.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 350M 44
RX 6600M 13780
+31218%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2006 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

FX 350M has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350M and Radeon RX 6600M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Quadro FX 350M
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 974 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.