RTX A2000 Mobile vs Quadro FX 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameG72MGA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date31 March 2006 (18 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$69 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72560
Core clock speed3 MHz893 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistors112 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate1.800108.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 350M and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR-3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDAno data8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2006 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350M and RTX A2000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Quadro FX 350M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 88 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.