Arc A370M vs Quadro FX 330

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.22
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV37DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date28 June 2004 (20 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed250 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors45 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00099.20
Floating-point processing powerno data3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs464
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 35 Watt

FX 330 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 330 and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 330 is a workstation card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 330
Quadro FX 330
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 163 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.