AMD Radeon R9 M395 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Comparison of Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q architecture, market type and release date.
Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
R9 M395 17.84
GTX 1650 Max-Q 19.87 +11.4%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
R9 M395 38490
GTX 1650 Max-Q 46686 +21.3%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
R9 M395 5920
GTX 1650 Max-Q 6850 +15.7%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
R9 M395 6819
GTX 1650 Max-Q 7740 +13.5%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
R9 M395 8656
GTX 1650 Max-Q 11046 +27.6%
R9 M395 5022
GTX 1650 Max-Q 5594 +11.4%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
More pipelines (1792 vs 896)
OpenCL 1.2 (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
OpenGL 4.3 (Open Graphics Library - an API for 3D graphics and GPUs usage)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Mantle (an API developed by AMD for 3D graphics acceleration. Discontinued and later superceded by Vulkan)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
11.4% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (23 April 2019 vs 9 June 2015)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 28 nm)
So, R9 M395 or GTX 1650 Max-Q?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.