Radeon R4 (Beema) vs Quadro 600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro 600
2010
1024 MB DDR3
1.38
+34%

Quadro 600 outperforms Radeon R4 (Beema) by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9601063
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.11no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.1 (2014)
GPU code nameGF108Beema
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 December 2010 (13 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data
Current price$118 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96128
Core clock speed640 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.24no data
Floating-point performance245.76 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro 600 and Radeon R4 (Beema) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortno data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/Ano data
CUDA2.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 600 1.38
+34%
R4 (Beema) 1.03

Quadro 600 outperforms Radeon R4 (Beema) by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 600 535
+34.1%
R4 (Beema) 399

Quadro 600 outperforms Radeon R4 (Beema) by 34% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
+25%
8
−25%

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.38 1.03
Recency 13 December 2010 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

The Quadro 600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R4 (Beema) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 600 is a workstation card while Radeon R4 (Beema) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 600
Quadro 600
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
Radeon R4 (Beema)

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 359 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 73 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.