Quadro RTX A6000 vs 600

Place in performance ranking	963	86
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.12	0.47
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GF108	Ampere
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 December 2010 (13 years ago)	5 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	$4,649
Current price	$118 (0.7x MSRP)	$8932 (1.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A6000 has 292% better value for money than Quadro 600.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	10752
Core clock speed	640 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.24	625.0
Floating-point performance	245.76 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	168 mm	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	768.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	2.1	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	5−6 −3080%	159 +3080%
1440p	4−5 −3125%	129 +3125%
4K	3−4 −3433%	106 +3433%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.38	41.77
Recency	13 December 2010	5 October 2020
Cost	$179	$4649
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	300 Watt