GeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro 5000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000M with GeForce RTX 2060, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000M
2010
1792 MB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.33

RTX 2060 outperforms 5000M by a whopping 586% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking625134
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data39.55
Power efficiency3.6815.76
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF100TU106
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 July 2010 (14 years ago)7 January 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201920
Core clock speed405 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate16.20201.6
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS6.451 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs40120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 5000M 5.33
RTX 2060 36.54
+586%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000M 2059
RTX 2060 14130
+586%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 5000M 7767
RTX 2060 60454
+678%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−669%
123
+669%
1440p10−12
−720%
82
+720%
4K7−8
−643%
52
+643%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.84
1440pno data4.26
4Kno data6.71

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−742%
100−110
+742%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−680%
75−80
+680%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−742%
100−110
+742%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−590%
145
+590%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−680%
75−80
+680%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−636%
103
+636%
Fortnite 30−33
−497%
179
+497%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−509%
140
+509%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−779%
167
+779%
Valorant 60−65
−300%
248
+300%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−742%
100−110
+742%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−514%
129
+514%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−222%
270−280
+222%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−680%
75−80
+680%
Dota 2 40−45
−226%
140−150
+226%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−607%
99
+607%
Fortnite 30−33
−417%
155
+417%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−470%
131
+470%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−629%
124
+629%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−644%
67
+644%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−737%
159
+737%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−871%
136
+871%
Valorant 60−65
−298%
247
+298%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−467%
119
+467%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−680%
75−80
+680%
Dota 2 40−45
−226%
140−150
+226%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−571%
94
+571%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−357%
105
+357%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−542%
122
+542%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−421%
73
+421%
Valorant 60−65
−161%
162
+161%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
−370%
141
+370%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−516%
230−240
+516%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−1240%
65−70
+1240%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−950%
42
+950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−415%
170−180
+415%
Valorant 55−60
−330%
241
+330%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−710%
80−85
+710%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−683%
90−95
+683%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−663%
60−65
+663%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−675%
60−65
+675%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−780%
85−90
+780%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−294%
67
+294%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5000%
51
+5000%
Valorant 24−27
−732%
208
+732%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2550%
53
+2550%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Dota 2 16−18
−500%
100−110
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−720%
41
+720%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−743%
59
+743%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−1100%
35−40
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−780%
44
+780%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−660%
38
+660%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Quadro 5000M and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 669% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 720% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 is 643% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 is 5000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is ahead in 64 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.33 36.54
Recency 27 July 2010 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 160 Watt

Quadro 5000M has 60% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060, on the other hand, has a 585.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 242.9% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10867 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000M or GeForce RTX 2060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.