GeForce GT 710M vs Quadro 5000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000M with GeForce GT 710M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000M
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.34
+364%

Quadro 5000M outperforms GT 710M by a whopping 364% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking6101075
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameFermiGF117
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 July 2010 (14 years ago)9 January 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32096
Core clock speed405 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate16.2012.40
Floating-point performance0.5184 gflops0.2976 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5000M 5.34
+364%
GT 710M 1.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000M 2059
+363%
GT 710M 445

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Hitman 3 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+370%
10−11
−370%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Hitman 3 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+370%
10−11
−370%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Hitman 3 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+370%
10−11
−370%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Hitman 3 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.34 1.15
Recency 27 July 2010 9 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro 5000M has a 364.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 710M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 5000M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 710M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
GeForce GT 710M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 199 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.