Quadro T1200 Mobile vs 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000
2011
2.5 GB GDDR5, 152 Watt
5.01

T1200 Mobile outperforms Quadro 5000 by a whopping 299% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking597259
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGF100TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date23 February 2011 (13 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data
Current price$991 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3521024
Core clock speed513 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate22.5791.20
Floating-point performance722.3 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro 5000 and Quadro T1200 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−314%
58
+314%
1440p8−9
−313%
33
+313%
4K18−21
−350%
81
+350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−333%
35−40
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−370%
47
+370%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−313%
65−70
+313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−306%
65
+306%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−342%
50−55
+342%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−333%
90−95
+333%
Hitman 3 9−10
−333%
35−40
+333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−329%
60
+329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−321%
59
+321%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−350%
54
+350%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−333%
35−40
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−300%
28
+300%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−313%
65−70
+313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−321%
59
+321%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−342%
50−55
+342%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−333%
90−95
+333%
Hitman 3 9−10
−333%
35−40
+333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−370%
47
+370%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−313%
65−70
+313%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−340%
44
+340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−344%
71
+344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−370%
47
+370%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−333%
35−40
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−320%
21
+320%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−313%
65−70
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−300%
56
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−342%
50−55
+342%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−333%
90−95
+333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−311%
37
+311%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−375%
19
+375%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Hitman 3 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−300%
32
+300%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−313%
30−35
+313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−310%
40−45
+310%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−322%
35−40
+322%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−310%
41
+310%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−333%
35−40
+333%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−300%
12
+300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Hitman 3 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

This is how Quadro 5000 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 314% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 313% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 350% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.01 19.97
Recency 23 February 2011 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2.5 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 152 Watt 95 Watt

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000 is a workstation card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 30 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 130 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.