Arc A380 vs Quadro 2000M

Place in the ranking	882	331
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.28	43.74
Power efficiency	2.56	14.97
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	GF106	DG2-128
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 January 2011 (13 years ago)	14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$46.56	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A380 has 15521% better value for money than Quadro 2000M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	1024
Core clock speed	550 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.60	131.2
Floating-point processing power	0.4224 TFLOPS	4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	32	64
Tensor Cores	no data	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	222 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	186.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2000M 2.02

Arc A380 16.11
+698%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 2000M 778

Arc A380 6215
+699%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 2000M 1261

Arc A380 13892
+1002%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 2000M 6634

Arc A380 53979
+714%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−27%

47
+27%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

1.26

3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
−650%

30−33

+650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −771%	61 +771%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −9600%	95−100 +9600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1120%	60−65 +1120%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2133%	65−70 +2133%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1420%	75−80 +1420%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1950%	160−170 +1950%
Hitman 3	7−8 −786%	60−65 +786%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −633%	130−140 +633%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −930%	100−110 +930%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −223%	110−120 +223%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −929%	72 +929%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −9600%	95−100 +9600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1120%	60−65 +1120%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2133%	65−70 +2133%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1420%	75−80 +1420%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1950%	160−170 +1950%
Hitman 3	7−8 −786%	60−65 +786%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −633%	130−140 +633%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −700%	80 +700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −425%	60−65 +425%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −223%	110−120 +223%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −314%	29 +314%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1120%	60−65 +1120%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2133%	65−70 +2133%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −613%	57 +613%
Hitman 3	7−8 −786%	60−65 +786%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −189%	52 +189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −510%	61 +510%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −183%	34 +183%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +40%	25 −40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1775%

75−80
+1775%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −1767%	55−60 +1767%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1450%	30−35 +1450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −3300%	30−35 +3300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1600%	30−35 +1600%
Hitman 3	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −933%	60−65 +933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −3800%	35−40 +3800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −1355%	160−170 +1355%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−900%

50−55
+900%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−2300%

24−27
+2300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	18−20
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	14−16

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−767%

24−27
+767%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50 +0%	50 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	37 +0%	37 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Hitman 3	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

This is how Quadro 2000M and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

Arc A380 is 27% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro 2000M is 40% faster.
in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A380 is 9600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro 2000M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Arc A380 is ahead in 47 tests (73%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.02	16.11
Recency	13 January 2011	14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	75 Watt

Quadro 2000M has 36.4% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 697.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 2000M is a mobile workstation card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.