Radeon RX 5600M vs Quadro 2000D

Place in performance ranking	794	229
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.41	35.13
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GF106	Navi 10
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	5 October 2011 (12 years ago)	7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data
Current price	$151 (0.3x MSRP)	$525

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5600M has 8468% better value for money than Quadro 2000D.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	2304
Core clock speed	625 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1265 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.00	182.2
Floating-point performance	480.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro 2000D and Radeon RX 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	178 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2000D 2.53

RX 5600M 22.54
+791%

Radeon RX 5600M outperforms Quadro 2000D by 791% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 2000D 976

RX 5600M 8705
+792%

Radeon RX 5600M outperforms Quadro 2000D by 792% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	9−10 −856%	86 +856%
1440p	6−7 −817%	55 +817%
4K	3−4 −1033%	34 +1033%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40
−733%

300−310

+733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	67 −721%	550−600 +721%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70 −757%	600−650 +757%
Battlefield 5	70−75 −778%	650−700 +778%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	76 −755%	650−700 +755%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −733%	300−310 +733%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −765%	450−500 +765%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −733%	500−550 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −750%	850−900 +750%
Hitman 3	67 −721%	550−600 +721%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150 −767%	1300−1350 +767%
Metro Exodus	137 −776%	1200−1250 +776%
Red Dead Redemption 2	76 −755%	650−700 +755%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −755%	650−700 +755%
Watch Dogs: Legion	78 −733%	650−700 +733%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60 −733%	500−550 +733%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	58 −762%	500−550 +762%
Battlefield 5	70−75 −778%	650−700 +778%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	68 −782%	600−650 +782%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −733%	300−310 +733%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −765%	450−500 +765%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −733%	500−550 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −750%	850−900 +750%
Hitman 3	55 −718%	450−500 +718%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −743%	750−800 +743%
Metro Exodus	89 −743%	750−800 +743%
Red Dead Redemption 2	68 −782%	600−650 +782%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −755%	650−700 +755%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	104 −765%	900−950 +765%
Watch Dogs: Legion	217 −776%	1900−1950 +776%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	49 −716%	400−450 +716%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45 −789%	400−450 +789%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50 −700%	400−450 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −733%	300−310 +733%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −765%	450−500 +765%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −750%	850−900 +750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	101 −742%	850−900 +742%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −755%	650−700 +755%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	64 −759%	550−600 +759%
Watch Dogs: Legion	32 −775%	280−290 +775%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

67
−721%

550−600

+721%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −714%	350−400 +714%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −751%	400−450 +751%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −770%	200−210 +770%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24 −775%	210−220 +775%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −767%	260−270 +767%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −689%	300−310 +689%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −695%	350−400 +695%
Hitman 3	38 −689%	300−310 +689%
Horizon Zero Dawn	73 −790%	650−700 +790%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −733%	350−400 +733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −733%	400−450 +733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −789%	240−250 +789%
Watch Dogs: Legion	26 −785%	230−240 +785%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
−711%

300−310

+711%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −764%	190−200 +764%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Hitman 3	20 −750%	170−180 +750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −785%	230−240 +785%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −767%	130−140 +767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −775%	210−220 +775%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −746%	110−120 +746%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14 −757%	120−130 +757%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −771%	270−280 +771%
Horizon Zero Dawn	39 −669%	300−310 +669%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −764%	190−200 +764%
Watch Dogs: Legion	13 −746%	110−120 +746%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
−750%

170−180

+750%

This is how Quadro 2000D and RX 5600M compete in popular games:

RX 5600M is 856% faster in 1080p
RX 5600M is 817% faster in 1440p
RX 5600M is 1033% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.53	22.54
Recency	5 October 2011	7 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt	60 Watt