Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 2000 with Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 2000
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 62 Watt
2.45

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms Quadro 2000 by a whopping 1342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking799134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4111.61
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGF106N19E-Q5 MAX-Q
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date24 December 2010 (13 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data
Current price$141 (0.2x MSRP)$2130

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 5000 Max-Q has 2732% better value for money than Quadro 2000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923072
Core clock speed625 MHz600 - 930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 - 1455 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt80 - 90 Watt
Texture fill rate20.00259.2
Floating-point performance480.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro 2000 and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length178 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2600 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2000 2.45
RTX 5000 Max-Q 35.33
+1342%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms 2000 by 1342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 2000 948
RTX 5000 Max-Q 13643
+1339%

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms 2000 by 1339% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−1400%
105
+1400%
1440p4−5
−1525%
65
+1525%
4K2−3
−2000%
42
+2000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 86
−1295%
1200−1250
+1295%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−1304%
1600−1650
+1304%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
−1336%
1450−1500
+1336%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−1310%
1100−1150
+1310%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−1304%
1250−1300
+1304%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−1339%
2000−2050
+1339%
Hitman 3 70−75
−1338%
1050−1100
+1338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 162
−1320%
2300−2350
+1320%
Metro Exodus 144
−1324%
2050−2100
+1324%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
−1292%
1350−1400
+1292%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−1329%
1900−1950
+1329%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
−1312%
1200−1250
+1312%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 78
−1310%
1100−1150
+1310%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−1304%
1600−1650
+1304%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 93
−1298%
1300−1350
+1298%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−1310%
1100−1150
+1310%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−1304%
1250−1300
+1304%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−1339%
2000−2050
+1339%
Hitman 3 70−75
−1338%
1050−1100
+1338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−1308%
2000−2050
+1308%
Metro Exodus 116
−1322%
1650−1700
+1322%
Red Dead Redemption 2 91
−1329%
1300−1350
+1329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−1329%
1900−1950
+1329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 145
−1314%
2050−2100
+1314%
Watch Dogs: Legion 182
−1329%
2600−2650
+1329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
−1329%
800−850
+1329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 67
−1318%
950−1000
+1318%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−1293%
850−900
+1293%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−1310%
1100−1150
+1310%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−1339%
2000−2050
+1339%
Horizon Zero Dawn 108
−1335%
1550−1600
+1335%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−1329%
1900−1950
+1329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 83
−1286%
1150−1200
+1286%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
−1273%
700−750
+1273%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85
−1312%
1200−1250
+1312%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−1318%
950−1000
+1318%
Far Cry New Dawn 105
−1329%
1500−1550
+1329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−1254%
650−700
+1254%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−1216%
500−550
+1216%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62
−1271%
850−900
+1271%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
Far Cry 5 74
−1319%
1050−1100
+1319%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−1338%
1050−1100
+1338%
Hitman 3 45−50
−1233%
600−650
+1233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 83
−1286%
1150−1200
+1286%
Metro Exodus 73
−1338%
1050−1100
+1338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−1329%
1200−1250
+1329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−1329%
700−750
+1329%
Watch Dogs: Legion 37
−1251%
500−550
+1251%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65
−1285%
900−950
+1285%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−1329%
500−550
+1329%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−1279%
400−450
+1279%
Hitman 3 27−30
−1279%
400−450
+1279%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−1264%
600−650
+1264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−1190%
400−450
+1190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−1300%
700−750
+1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
−1190%
400−450
+1190%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−1329%
300−310
+1329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27
−1196%
350−400
+1196%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1264%
150−160
+1264%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−1300%
280−290
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−1329%
700−750
+1329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 46
−1313%
650−700
+1313%
Metro Exodus 43
−1295%
600−650
+1295%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
−1329%
300−310
+1329%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 34
−1224%
450−500
+1224%

This is how Quadro 2000 and RTX 5000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 1400% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 1525% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 2000% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.45 35.33
Recency 24 December 2010 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 80 Watt

The Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 2000 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 290 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 41 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.