Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Quadro 1000M

Place in performance ranking	938	1174
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.12	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	Fermi	RV630
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 February 2011 (13 years ago)	28 June 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$174.95	no data
Current price	$129 (0.7x MSRP)	$100

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro 1000M and ATI HD 2600 PRO have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	120
Core clock speed	700 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	390 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.20	4.800
Floating-point performance	268.8 gflops	144 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro 1000M and Radeon HD 2600 PRO compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory type	DDR3	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	16 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 1000M 1.47
+167%

ATI HD 2600 PRO 0.55

Quadro 1000M outperforms Radeon HD 2600 PRO by 167% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 1000M 569
+170%

ATI HD 2600 PRO 211

Quadro 1000M outperforms Radeon HD 2600 PRO by 170% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

41
+193%

14−16

−193%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+300%

1−2

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

This is how Quadro 1000M and ATI HD 2600 PRO compete in popular games:

Quadro 1000M is 193% faster than ATI HD 2600 PRO in 1080p

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	1.47	0.55
Recency	22 February 2011	28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	35 Watt