Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Quadro 1000M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 1000M and Quadro T1200 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro 1000M
2011
2 GB DDR3, 45 Watt
1.25

T1200 Mobile outperforms 1000M by a whopping 1238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1002301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
Power efficiency2.2174.04
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF108TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date13 January 2011 (14 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$174.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Core clock speed700 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors585 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate11.2091.20
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs1664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 1000M 1.25
T1200 Mobile 16.73
+1238%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 1000M 943
T1200 Mobile 14387
+1426%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 1000M 4566
T1200 Mobile 44135
+867%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
−28.9%
58
+28.9%
1440p2−3
−1550%
33
+1550%
4K6−7
−1250%
81
+1250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.89no data
1440p87.48no data
4K29.16no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−3700%
75−80
+3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Fortnite 4−5
−2325%
95−100
+2325%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−590%
65−70
+590%
Valorant 30−35
−309%
130−140
+309%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−3700%
75−80
+3700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−647%
220−230
+647%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Dota 2 16−18
−571%
114
+571%
Fortnite 4−5
−2325%
95−100
+2325%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−7000%
71
+7000%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−590%
65−70
+590%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1083%
71
+1083%
Valorant 30−35
−309%
130−140
+309%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3700%
75−80
+3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Dota 2 16−18
−529%
107
+529%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−590%
65−70
+590%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−517%
37
+517%
Valorant 30−35
−1224%
450−500
+1224%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−2325%
95−100
+2325%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−1550%
130−140
+1550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1208%
170−180
+1208%
Valorant 6−7
−2800%
170−180
+2800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4000%
41
+4000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1433%
45−50
+1433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−120%
30−35
+120%
Valorant 7−8
−1371%
100−110
+1371%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
−10800%
109
+10800%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how Quadro 1000M and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 29% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 1550% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 1250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 10800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 32 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 16.73
Recency 13 January 2011 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 1238.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 1000M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Quadro 1000M
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 123 votes

Rate Quadro 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 1000M or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.