GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile vs P106-090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 P104-100 P104-101 P106-090 P106-100
VS
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile RTX 3050 6GB Mobile RTX 3050 A Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Ti Mobile RTX 3060 Mobile RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Ti Mobile RTX 3080 Max-Q RTX 3080 Mobile RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P106-090 with GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

P106-090
2017
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
6.07

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile outperforms P106-090 by a whopping 741% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P106-090 P106-090
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking58053
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.6330.87
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP106GA103S
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date31 July 2017 (7 years ago)25 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687424
Core clock speed1354 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1260 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate73.49292.3
Floating-point processing power2.352 TFLOPS18.71 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs48232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length250 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P106-090 6.07
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 51.07
+741%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P106-090 2342
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 19702
+741%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−781%
141
+781%
1440p10−12
−800%
90
+800%
4K7−8
−771%
61
+771%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 136
+0%
136
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 118
+0%
118
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 162
+0%
162
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
+0%
100
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 160
+0%
160
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 229
+0%
229
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
+0%
87
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Hitman 3 143
+0%
143
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 194
+0%
194
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200
+0%
200
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
+0%
84
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+0%
70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 107
+0%
107
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 154
+0%
154
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150
+0%
150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+0%
86
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 216
+0%
216
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+0%
48
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 93
+0%
93
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
+0%
42
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how P106-090 and RTX 3080 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 781% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 800% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is 771% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.07 51.07
Recency 31 July 2017 25 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 115 Watt

P106-090 has 53.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 741.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the P106-090 in performance tests.

Be aware that P106-090 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P106-090 P106 090
vs
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
P106-090 P106 090
vs
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
P106-090 P106 090
vs
GP104 GP104
P106-090 P106 090
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
P106-090 P106 090
vs
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
P106-090 P106 090
vs
T600 T600
P106-090 P106 090
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
P106-090 P106 090
vs
Alder Lake GT1 Alder Lake GT1
P106-090 P106 090
vs
GT 1010 DDR4 GeForce GT 1010 DDR4
P106-090 P106 090
vs
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 710
P106-090 P106 090
vs
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
P106-090 P106 090
vs
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 49 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 281 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.