A10G vs NVS 810

Place in the ranking	824	182
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.22	16.64
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code name	GM107	GA102
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 November 2015 (10 years ago)	12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512 ×2	9216
Core clock speed	902 MHz	1320 MHz
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz	1710 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	33.06 ×2	492.5
Floating-point processing power	1.058 TFLOPS ×2	31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	16 ×2	96
TMUs	32 ×2	288
Tensor Cores	no data	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72
L1 Cache	256 KB	9 MB
L2 Cache	1024 KB	6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	198 mm	267 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB ×2	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit ×2	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s ×2	600.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

8x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	5.0	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 810 2.85

A10G 32.50
+1040%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 810 1191
Samples: 29

A10G 13598
+1042%

Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.85	32.50
Recency	4 November 2015	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	150 Watt

NVS 810 has 120.6% lower power consumption.

A10G, on the other hand, has a 1040.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 810 in performance tests.