NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVS 810
Comparison of Quadro FX 5800 and NVS 810 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro FX 5800 and NVS 810's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro FX 5800 and NVS 810's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
48.8 GTexel / s
33.06 GTexel / s
2x 1,058 gflops
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro FX 5800 and NVS 810 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro FX 5800 and NVS 810: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
102.4 GB / s
14.4 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro FX 5800 and NVS 810.
2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
APIs supported by Quadro FX 5800 and NVS 810, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro FX 5800 and NVS 810. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
FX 5800 2.33 +13.1%
NVS 810 2.06
FX 5800 1110 +13.1%
NVS 810 981
Let's see how good Quadro FX 5800 and NVS 810 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
13.1% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (512 vs 64 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (102.4 vs 14.4 GB/s)
Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 810
Much newer (4 November 2015 vs 11 November 2008)
More pipelines (512 vs 240)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 55 nm)
Less power hungry (68 vs 189 watts)
So, Quadro FX 5800 or NVS 810?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro FX 5800 and NVS 810, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.