Quadro RTX A6000 vs NVS 2100M
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 85 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | no data | 0.46 |
Architecture | GT2xx (2009−2012) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | GT218 | Ampere |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 5 October 2020 (3 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,649 |
Current price | $142 | $8932 (1.9x MSRP) |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 10752 |
Core clock speed | 535 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1800 MHz |
Number of transistors | 260 million | 28,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 11 Watt | 300 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 4.280 | 625.0 |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | no data |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on NVS 2100M and Quadro RTX A6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 267 mm |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 8-pin EPS |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 48 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 16000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB/s | 768.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 1.2 | 8.6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Quadro RTX A6000 outperforms NVS 2100M by 8923% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Pros & Cons Summary
Recency | 7 January 2010 | 5 October 2020 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 48 GB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 11 Watt | 300 Watt |
We couldn't decide between NVS 2100M and Quadro RTX A6000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.